IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Haldane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 42 9 9 18 0.429 0.0577 0.0584 0.1459 0.1476
2018-19 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 18 21 39 0.886 0.1193 0.1144 0.3017 0.2892
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 3 1 4 0.160
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 25 6 3 9 0.360
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 25 2 2 4 0.160
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39633
Forward overall
#1831
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Klishko
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rogers
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kai Kapossy
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.