IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Locke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Worcester Academy NE-Prep 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0482 0.0482 0.1144 0.1144
2022-23 Northeast Generals NA3HL 33 2 15 17 0.515 0.0570 0.0576 0.1632 0.1648
2023-24 Northeast Generals NA3HL 25 3 15 18 0.720 0.0796 0.0766 0.2281 0.2194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 14 1 0 1 0.071
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12953
Defenseman overall
#2554
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Albergo
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Fisher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.