IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Fuller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 39 8 16 24 0.615 0.1565 0.1669 0.2553 0.2723
2011-12 Soo Greyhounds OHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1339 0.1319 0.5914 0.5825
2012-13 — OHL 18 2 0 2 0.111 0.0645 0.0603 0.2847 0.2661
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Southern Maine
+98.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15878
Defenseman overall
#1657
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Reilly
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trey Gardner
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Stubbings
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.