IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Fuller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Windsor · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 39 8 16 24 0.615 0.1028 0.1097 0.2562 0.2733
2011-12 Soo Greyhounds OHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1335 0.1315 0.5930 0.5840
2012-13 — OHL 18 2 0 2 0.111 0.0643 0.0601 0.2855 0.2669
2014-15 Univ. of Windsor USports-M 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0703 0.0741 0.3907 0.4118
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Southern Maine
+157.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19740
Defenseman overall
#1902
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathieu Dubuc
Middlebury · 2011-12
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Backman
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.