IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Bernhardson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Eastview High (MN) USHS-MN 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.1184 0.1115 0.1069 0.1007
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 36 1 14 15 0.417 0.0502 0.0508 0.1316 0.1331
2016-17 Mason City Toros NA3HL 40 1 16 17 0.425 0.0512 0.0492 0.1343 0.1290
2017-18 Mason City Toros NA3HL 45 10 36 46 1.022 0.1232 0.1121 0.3229 0.2938
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 0 3 3 0.115
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14790
Defenseman overall
#2007
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Maxwell
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Silard
Hobart · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Gibson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.