IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 58 1 4 5 0.086 0.0320 0.0323 0.0913 0.0923
2009-10 Marquette Rangers NAHL 57 2 18 20 0.351 0.1303 0.1265 — —
2010-11 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1470 0.1296 0.6916 0.6095
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 8 24 32 1.032
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 30 6 17 23 0.767
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 27 2 13 15 0.556
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 29 2 11 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+269.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5395
Defenseman overall
#985
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Bevilacqua
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedan Cross
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaun Patry
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.