IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Fisher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-12-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 37 3 1 4 0.108 0.0403 0.0444 0.1575 0.1736
2004-05 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 45 2 4 6 0.133 0.0497 0.0525 0.1942 0.2050
2005-06 Neepawa Titans MJHL 48 19 21 40 0.833 0.2266 0.2281 0.5251 0.5286
2006-07 Neepawa Titans MJHL 60 33 28 61 1.017 0.2764 0.2653 0.6407 0.6150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 14 2 1 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
-0.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26805
Forward overall
#887
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Russo
Elmira · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Oye
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.