IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Fransky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-12-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 49 5 25 30 0.612 0.1710 0.1827 0.4225 0.4514
2003-04 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 28 6 13 19 0.679 0.1896 0.1940 0.4683 0.4793
2004-05 — OJHL 39 16 32 48 1.231 0.3439 0.3346 0.8494 0.8264
2005-06 Port Hope Predators OJHL 46 26 45 71 1.544 0.4313 0.4037 1.0652 0.9971
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Elmira D3 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Morrisville D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7543
Forward overall
#249
Forward born in 1985
#215
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Schultz
St. Norbert · 2000-01
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Mazur
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.