IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roman Ammirato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 37 19 15 34 0.919 0.1993 0.1984 0.7113 0.7082
2012-13 — CCHL 61 34 49 83 1.361 0.2951 0.2808 1.0533 1.0022
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 57 17 30 47 0.825 0.2929 0.2703 0.8657 0.7990
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC — 27 22 21 43 1.593
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC — 27 12 23 35 1.296
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC — 19 1 1 2 0.105
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC — 32 2 4 6 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2014-15 · Union
-20.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11429
Forward overall
#426
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Metheral
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.