IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Albergo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 20 5 2 7 0.350 0.1286 0.1241 0.3694 0.3566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 24 7 10 17 0.708
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 10 10 20 0.800
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 23 6 7 13 0.565
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 6 9 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2013-14 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+488.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38502
Forward overall
#1454
Forward born in 1992
#4035
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex LoGuercio
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Breyden Zupsansky
Chatham · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Haldane
New England College · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.