IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Breyden Zupsansky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 20 27 47 1.068 0.5956 0.5797 0.8637 0.8407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 UCHC — 21 3 4 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Chatham
-38.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7918
Forward overall
#288
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Felan
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dayne Bihn
Neumann · 2003-04
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.