IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy York Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 42 8 5 13 0.309 0.1149 0.1167 0.3277 0.3327
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 49 24 17 41 0.837 0.3107 0.2986 0.8859 0.8514
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 9 1 4 5 0.556
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 25 13 13 26 1.040
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 26 13 10 23 0.885
2017-18 RPI D1 — FR 16 3 5 8 0.500
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 12 8 4 12 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · RPI
+158.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16668
Forward overall
#685
Forward born in 1996
#1348
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Frost
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.