IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Felan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.0688 0.0695 0.1961 0.1980
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 43 17 23 40 0.930 0.1996 0.1931 0.4555 0.4407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 7 1 3 4 0.571
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 21 6 12 18 0.857
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 23 5 3 8 0.348
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 22 7 13 20 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2015-16 · Lawrence
+639.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28428
Forward overall
#1159
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.