IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Filion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rockland Nationals CCHL 52 11 7 18 0.346 0.0988 0.1077 0.2680 0.2922
2022-23 Estevan Bruins SJHL 30 11 8 19 0.633 0.1830 0.1933 0.4767 0.5036
2023-24 Estevan Bruins SJHL 52 9 14 23 0.442 0.1278 0.1289 0.3330 0.3359
2024-25 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 27 9 10 19 0.704 0.2350 0.2214 0.6532 0.6153
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 26 9 6 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2025-26 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+265.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19469
Forward overall
#944
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bret Adams
Curry · 2002-03
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.