IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Filion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rockland Nationals CCHL 52 11 7 18 0.346 0.0751 0.0819 0.2679 0.2920
2022-23 Estevan Bruins SJHL 30 11 8 19 0.633 0.1623 0.1714 0.4774 0.5043
2023-24 Estevan Bruins SJHL 52 9 14 23 0.442 0.1133 0.1143 0.3334 0.3363
2024-25 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 27 9 10 19 0.704 0.2360 0.2223 0.6512 0.6135
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 26 9 6 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2025-26 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+276.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26862
Forward overall
#1541
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bret Adams
Curry · 2002-03
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.