IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Blake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — OJHL 39 5 8 13 0.333 0.0931 0.1006 0.2300 0.2486
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 13 11 24 0.453 0.1265 0.1303 0.3125 0.3218
2009-10 Wellington Dukes OJHL 43 18 12 30 0.698 0.1949 0.1905 0.4815 0.4705
2010-11 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 16 27 43 0.878 0.2452 0.2282 0.6056 0.5636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 23 5 8 13 0.565
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 4 1 1 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+174.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19940
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 1990
#1481
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Dillon
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tucker Coborn
Concordia · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.