← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Blake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 OJHL 39 5 8 13 0.333 0.0817 0.0883 0.2295 0.2481
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 13 11 24 0.453 0.1110 0.1143 0.3118 0.3211
2009-10 Wellington Dukes OJHL 43 18 12 30 0.698 0.1710 0.1671 0.4804 0.4694
2010-11 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 16 27 43 0.878 0.2151 0.2002 0.6042 0.5623
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 5 8 13 0.565
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 4 1 1 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+212.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25853
Forward overall
#959
Forward born in 1990
#1209
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.