| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | — | OJHL | 39 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.333 | 0.0817 | 0.0883 | 0.2295 | 0.2481 |
| 2008-09 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 53 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.453 | 0.1110 | 0.1143 | 0.3118 | 0.3211 |
| 2009-10 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 43 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 0.698 | 0.1710 | 0.1671 | 0.4804 | 0.4694 |
| 2010-11 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 49 | 16 | 27 | 43 | 0.878 | 0.2151 | 0.2002 | 0.6042 | 0.5623 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 26 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.615 |
| 2013-14 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 24 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2012-13 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 23 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.565 |
| 2011-12 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.