IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Delezenne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 38 15 9 24 0.632 0.0583 0.0590 0.1446 0.1463
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 29 25 54 1.350 0.1246 0.1203 0.3092 0.2985
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA — 24 2 4 6 0.250
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Westfield State
+408.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30647
Forward overall
#1218
Forward born in 1995
#127
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Lenius
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Cardwell
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burr
University of New England · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.