IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Lenius Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-11-26 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Toronto · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Markham Waxers OJHL 15 1 2 3 0.200 0.0490 0.0524 0.1377 0.1472
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 46 5 10 15 0.326 0.0799 0.0814 0.2245 0.2286
2005-06 Markham Waxers OJHL 42 8 13 21 0.500 0.1226 0.1203 0.3443 0.3379
2006-07 Collingwood Blues OJHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.1838 0.1712 0.5164 0.4809
2008-09 Univ. of Toronto USports-M 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.1758 0.1817 0.9769 1.0094
2009-10 Univ. of Toronto USports-M 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.2110 0.2084 1.1724 1.1582
2010-11 Univ. of Toronto USports-M 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.1218 0.1147 0.6765 0.6373
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9078
Defenseman overall
#1100
Defenseman born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Simpson
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.