Manny Gialedakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-18 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2008-09	Newmarket Hurricanes	OJHL	1	1	0	1	1.000	0.2451	0.2697	0.6885	0.7575
2009-10	Toronto Dixie Beehives	OJHL	49	20	26	46	0.939	0.2301	0.2411	0.6464	0.6772
2010-11	Fresno Monsters	NAHL	19	2	6	8	0.421	0.1547	0.1593	0.4445	0.4576
2011-12	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	44	15	14	29	0.659	0.1615	0.1546	0.4538	0.4343
2012-13	Alberni Valley Bulldogs	BCHL	52	20	26	46	0.885	0.3408	0.3120	1.2874	1.1786
2014-15	Univ. of Lethbridge	USports-M	15	0	3	3	0.200	0.1055	0.1066	0.5862	0.5923
2015-16	Univ. of Guelph	USports-M	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2016-17	Univ. of Guelph	USports-M	28	8	9	17	0.607	0.3203	0.2921	1.7794	1.6229
2017-18	Univ. of Guelph	USports-M	28	7	16	23	0.821	0.4334	0.3756	2.4075	2.0863

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	SUNY Oswego	D3	SUNYAC	FR	4	0	3	3	0.750

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.21

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.75

2013-14 · SUNY Oswego

+251.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13180

Forward overall

#521

Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom

University of New England · 2013-14

1.654 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Shaquille Merasty

Adrian · 2011-12

1.357 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brett Gravelle

St. Thomas · 2015-16

0.923 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.