← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan McDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0404 0.0487 0.0900 0.1085
2003-04 Regina Pats WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Regina Pats WHL 58 2 4 6 0.103 0.0503 0.0543 0.2524 0.2726
2005-06 Regina Pats WHL 39 5 3 8 0.205 0.0997 0.1030 0.5006 0.5171
2006-07 WHL 67 27 23 50 0.746 0.3629 0.3564 1.8216 1.7888
2007-08 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 71 26 33 59 0.831 0.4040 0.3760 2.0283 1.8878
2008-09 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 70 37 26 63 0.900 0.4376 0.3856 2.1967 1.9357
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Framingham State D3 SR 23 13 16 29 1.261
2013-14 Framingham State D3 JR 26 13 16 29 1.115
2012-13 Framingham State D3 SO 24 18 13 31 1.292
2011-12 Framingham State D3 FR 11 6 3 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2011-12 · Framingham State
+150.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5021
Forward overall
#226
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.