IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Stillar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Burlington Cougars OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Burlington Cougars OJHL 35 15 8 23 0.657 0.1611 0.1691 0.4524 0.4748
2009-10 Burlington Cougars OJHL 46 28 31 59 1.283 0.3144 0.3135 0.8831 0.8805
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 42 39 38 77 1.833 0.4493 0.4271 1.2622 1.1997
2011-12 Markham Waxers OJHL 12 10 7 17 1.417 0.3472 0.3147 0.9754 0.8841
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 13 5 10 15 1.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2011-12 · SUNY Morrisville
+253.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7068
Forward overall
#303
Forward born in 1991
#54
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Krupcyznski
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.