IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Burr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 40 5 19 24 0.600 0.0753 0.0792 0.1894 0.1993
2014-15 Michigan Warriors NAHL 50 3 7 10 0.200 0.0735 0.0743 0.2111 0.2134
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 10 14 24 0.490 0.1800 0.1740 0.5170 0.4998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE SR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE SR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2018-19 University of New England D1 CNE SR 10 1 2 3 0.300
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE SR 10 1 2 3 0.300
2017-18 University of New England D3 CNE SO 29 5 21 26 0.897
2016-17 University of New England D3 CNE FR 26 5 11 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · University of New England
+386.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11147
Defenseman overall
#1545
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2011-12
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Smith
Chatham · 2021-22
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.