IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Dawson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-12-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 1 9 10 0.182 0.0394 0.0451 0.1393 0.1594
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 3 20 23 0.411 0.0891 0.0967 0.3146 0.3415
2009-10 — CCHL 53 9 20 29 0.547 0.1187 0.1234 0.4192 0.4358
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 53 4 26 30 0.566 0.1228 0.1216 0.4336 0.4293
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 38 3 25 28 0.737 0.1598 0.1500 0.5644 0.5299
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2014-15 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 14 1 9 10 0.714
2013-14 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 26 2 13 15 0.577
2012-13 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 25 9 8 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2012-13 · Nazareth
+419.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6745
Defenseman overall
#991
Defenseman born in 1991
#585
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jim Pearson
Concordia · 2015-16
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Kramer
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.