IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Pearson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-12-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 46 2 10 12 0.261 0.0969 0.0985 0.2762 0.2807
2010-11 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 58 17 29 46 0.793 0.2945 0.2843 0.8397 0.8107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2013-14 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 27 5 10 15 0.556
2012-13 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 5 12 17 0.708
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 28 5 14 19 0.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2011-12 · Gustavus Adolphus
+277.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18588
Forward overall
#775
Forward born in 1990
#1646
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Pickering
Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Arrigoni
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.