| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 58 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.276 | 0.0797 | 0.0842 | 0.2077 | 0.2195 |
| 2012-13 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 50 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.400 | 0.1156 | 0.1170 | 0.3011 | 0.3048 |
| 2013-14 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 53 | 19 | 34 | 53 | 1.000 | 0.2889 | 0.2772 | 0.7528 | 0.7224 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | GR | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
| 2016-17 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | JR | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
| 2015-16 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SR | 24 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.542 |
| 2015-16 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | SO | 24 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.542 |
| 2014-15 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | JR | 21 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.809 |
| 2014-15 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | FR | 21 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.809 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.