IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jory Mullin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Neepawa Titans MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Winkler Flyers MJHL 46 15 23 38 0.826 0.2337 0.2481 0.5205 0.5525
2011-12 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 22 42 64 1.085 0.3069 0.3103 0.6835 0.6912
2012-13 Winkler Flyers MJHL 60 27 44 71 1.183 0.3348 0.3219 0.7456 0.7169
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 26 18 44 1.760
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 26 11 6 17 0.654
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 23 8 6 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2013-14 · Neumann
+124.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10228
Forward overall
#444
Forward born in 1992
#141
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
R.G. Flath
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.