IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jory Mullin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Neepawa Titans MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Winkler Flyers MJHL 46 15 23 38 0.826 0.1590 0.1688 0.5209 0.5529
2011-12 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 22 42 64 1.085 0.2088 0.2111 0.6840 0.6917
2012-13 Winkler Flyers MJHL 60 27 44 71 1.183 0.2278 0.2190 0.7462 0.7175
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 26 18 44 1.760
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 26 11 6 17 0.654
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 23 8 6 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2013-14 · Neumann
+229.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16921
Forward overall
#645
Forward born in 1992
#114
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louis Ouellet
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
R.G. Flath
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.