IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Corran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Calgary Canucks AJHL 45 16 20 36 0.800 0.2672 0.2663 0.7426 0.7401
2001-02 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 21 26 47 0.783 0.2616 0.2480 0.7271 0.6893
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2005-06 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 30 0 2 2 0.067
2004-05 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 26 4 2 6 0.231
2002-03 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 28 9 17 26 0.929
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2002-03 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+324.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13315
Forward overall
#441
Forward born in 1981
#540
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Reavis
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tory Allan
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.