IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Warfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0512 0.0543 0.1508 0.1600
2015-16 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 44 25 50 75 1.704 0.1573 0.1513 0.3903 0.3754
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Utica D1 UCHC JR 8 1 3 4 0.500
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC GR 8 1 3 4 0.500
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SR 14 5 3 8 0.571
2016-17 Daniel Webster D3 — FR 12 1 5 6 0.500
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Daniel Webster
+419.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16115
Forward overall
#612
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gunther Stange
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Day
Stevenson · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Degerness
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.