IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunther Stange Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Long Beach Sharks NA3HL 39 15 30 45 1.154 0.1448 0.1450 0.3643 0.3647
2017-18 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 34 22 32 54 1.588 0.2077 0.1986 0.5390 0.5155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D1 MASCAC FR 21 2 3 5 0.238
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 21 2 3 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Worcester State
+57.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8470
Forward overall
#393
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Routh
St. Michael's College · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.