| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Rochester Mustangs | USHL | 60 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 0.417 | 0.2654 | 0.2517 | 1.2487 | 1.1842 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | JR | 26 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 0.962 |
| 2003-04 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | SO | 31 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.677 |
| 2002-03 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | FR | 31 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 0.903 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.