IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Day Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Metro HC USPHL-Premier 6 2 1 3 0.500 0.0564 0.0564 0.1701 0.1701
2022-23 Ogden Mustangs USPHL-Premier 49 10 19 29 0.592 0.0668 0.0673 0.2013 0.2029
2023-24 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 10 27 37 0.949 0.1070 0.1027 0.3227 0.3096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 23 2 4 6 0.261
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19386
Forward overall
#995
Forward born in 2003
#1292
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Grimstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mario Tropea
Endicott · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.