IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 47 2 6 8 0.170 0.0656 0.0754 0.2475 0.2845
2011-12 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 52 11 16 27 0.519 0.1330 0.1416 0.3910 0.4162
2013-14 — SJHL 54 12 15 27 0.500 0.1281 0.1296 0.3765 0.3809
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 54 10 25 35 0.648 0.1660 0.1592 0.4880 0.4681
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 25 2 10 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2015-16 · Norwich
+280.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33033
Forward overall
#1266
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Camden Markham
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Lee
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.