IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 17 28 45 0.789 0.2901 0.2925 0.8333 0.8403
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 19 25 44 0.759 0.2787 0.2670 0.8007 0.7672
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC — 23 5 9 14 0.609
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC — 24 5 10 15 0.625
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 11 0 4 4 0.364
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 26 4 12 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2014-15 · St. Norbert
+159.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15152
Forward overall
#546
Forward born in 1993
#725
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Tolan
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Kane
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.