IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Kane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 48 27 47 74 1.542 0.3561 0.3455 0.7543 0.7317
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 20 4 9 13 0.650
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 12 3 3 6 0.500
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 10 2 2 4 0.400
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 24 5 7 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Lake Forest
+69.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
5%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4992
Forward overall
#249
Forward born in 1997
#10
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Bombardier
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Hartman
Hobart · 2021-22
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.