IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Dekumbis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-11 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0464 0.0469 0.1323 0.1338
2017-18 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 33 15 24 39 1.182 0.1424 0.1356 0.3733 0.3555
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 26 3 11 14 0.538
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 8 2 5 7 0.875
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 27 5 14 19 0.704
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 23 7 8 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2018-19 · Lawrence
+661.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35638
Forward overall
#1645
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David DuBord
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Haldane
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lonny Forrester
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.