IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Grimstad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 46 10 25 35 0.761 0.2825 0.2831 0.8056 0.8073
2008-09 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 11 31 42 0.778 0.2888 0.2751 0.8235 0.7843
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SR 27 7 13 20 0.741
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — JR 24 8 8 16 0.667
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 14 2 7 9 0.643
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stout
+59.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17670
Forward overall
#754
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.