icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 42 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 0.500 | 0.3184 | 0.3343 | 1.4984 | 1.5733 |
| 2001-02 | — | USHL | 48 | 13 | 24 | 37 | 0.771 | 0.4908 | 0.4909 | 2.3099 | 2.3104 |
| 2002-03 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 46 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 1.087 | 0.6922 | 0.6494 | 3.2574 | 3.0559 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Miami | D1 | — | SR | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2005-06 | Bowdoin | D3 | — | SR | 27 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2005-06 | Miami | D1 | — | JR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2004-05 | Bowdoin | D3 | — | JR | 19 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.579 |
| 2004-05 | Miami | D1 | — | SO | 33 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.242 |
| 2003-04 | Bowdoin | D3 | — | SO | 22 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 0.636 |
| 2003-04 | Miami | D1 | — | FR | 35 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.400 |
| 2002-03 | Bowdoin | D3 | — | FR | 7 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.714 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.