IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taki Pantziris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 49 13 20 33 0.673 0.1882 0.1962 0.4648 0.4845
2012-13 Sarnia Sting OHL 21 2 4 6 0.286 0.1705 0.1590 0.7400 0.6900
2013-14 — BCHL 54 13 20 33 0.611 0.2378 0.2165 0.8912 0.8114
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Brown D1 ECAC SO 7 1 1 2 0.286
2011-12 Brown D1 ECAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3885
Defenseman overall
#747
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.