IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taki Pantziris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 49 13 20 33 0.673 0.1651 0.1721 0.4637 0.4833
2012-13 Sarnia Sting OHL 21 2 4 6 0.286 0.1653 0.1541 0.7341 0.6845
2013-14 — BCHL 54 13 20 33 0.611 0.2355 0.2144 0.8893 0.8096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Brown D1 ECAC SO 7 1 1 2 0.286
2011-12 Brown D1 ECAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6755
Defenseman overall
#967
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Kennedy
Neumann · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Carballo
Endicott · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.