| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | — | OJHL | 39 | 7 | 22 | 29 | 0.744 | 0.2078 | 0.2059 | 0.5132 | 0.5085 |
| 2009-10 | Villanova Knights | OJHL | 56 | 23 | 43 | 66 | 1.179 | 0.3293 | 0.3090 | 0.8134 | 0.7632 |
| 2010-11 | Villanova Knights | OJHL | 49 | 25 | 59 | 84 | 1.714 | 0.4790 | 0.4271 | 1.1830 | 1.0549 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | SR | 28 | 8 | 26 | 34 | 1.214 |
| 2013-14 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | JR | 32 | 11 | 27 | 38 | 1.188 |
| 2012-13 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | SO | 29 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.655 |
| 2011-12 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | FR | 28 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.464 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.