← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Baptista Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 OJHL 39 7 22 29 0.744 0.2078 0.2059 0.5132 0.5085
2009-10 Villanova Knights OJHL 56 23 43 66 1.179 0.3293 0.3090 0.8134 0.7632
2010-11 Villanova Knights OJHL 49 25 59 84 1.714 0.4790 0.4271 1.1830 1.0549
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 8 26 34 1.214
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 11 27 38 1.188
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 7 12 19 0.655
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 3 10 13 0.464
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2011-12 · St. Norbert
+42.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6580
Forward overall
#279
Forward born in 1990
#163
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2016-17
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.