| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 68 | 7 | 32 | 39 | 0.574 | 0.3328 | 0.3481 | 1.4696 | 1.5371 |
| 2001-02 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 67 | 10 | 36 | 46 | 0.687 | 0.3984 | 0.3974 | 1.7594 | 1.7549 |
| 2002-03 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 55 | 14 | 39 | 53 | 0.964 | 0.5592 | 0.5306 | 2.4692 | 2.3430 |
| 2010-11 | Avangard Omsk | KHL | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2.000 | 5.0000 | 4.9583 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 21 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.476 | 1.1905 | 0.9996 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Hamilton | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.444 |
| 2002-03 | Hamilton | D3 | — | FR | 18 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.333 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.