← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Fitzpatrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-10-14 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 46 2 14 16 0.348 0.1167 0.1217 0.3208 0.3347
2006-07 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 60 5 38 43 0.717 0.2761 0.2743 1.0414 1.0348
2007-08 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 51 10 26 36 0.706 0.2368 0.2231 0.6511 0.6133
2008-09 Brock Univ. USports-M 14 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA 26 2 15 17 0.654
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA 27 5 24 29 1.074
2009-10 Marian D3 NCHA 24 6 23 29 1.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2009-10 · Marian
+410.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12360
Defenseman overall
#1296
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.