← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin Kerchoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 El Paso Rhinos NA3HL 29 6 14 20 0.690 0.0831 0.0831 0.2179 0.2179
2021-22 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 41 14 30 44 1.073 0.1293 0.1225 0.3390 0.3213
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750
2024-25 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750
2023-24 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC 20 5 4 9 0.450
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 20 5 4 9 0.450
2022-23 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC 26 4 11 15 0.577
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 25 4 11 15 0.600
2021-22 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750
2020-21 Cleary University ACHA_D1 20 7 8 15 0.750

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35713
Forward overall
#1542
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.