IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Quad City Jr. Flames NA3HL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0142 0.0154 0.0351 0.0380
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 — NOJHL 32 4 11 15 0.469 0.0798 0.0796 0.1987 0.1981
2014-15 — NA3HL 40 16 29 45 1.125 0.1433 0.1355 0.3558 0.3364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC SR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 7 2 0 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Bethel
+180.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36287
Forward overall
#1420
Forward born in 1994
#1615
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Rivait
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Radford
Marian · 2015-16
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Levine
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.