IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Quad City Jr. Flames NA3HL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0134 0.0145 0.0351 0.0380
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 — NOJHL 32 4 11 15 0.469 0.0790 0.0788 0.1948 0.1942
2014-15 — NA3HL 40 16 29 45 1.125 0.1356 0.1282 0.3554 0.3360
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 7 2 0 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Bethel
+193.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41495
Forward overall
#1746
Forward born in 1994
#1560
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Rivait
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Reif
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Riddell
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.