IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Rivait Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Oakville Blades OJHL 55 6 31 37 0.673 0.1649 0.1605 0.4632 0.4508
2010-11 Oakville Blades OJHL 43 3 26 29 0.674 0.1653 0.1532 0.4643 0.4303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 27 3 20 23 0.852
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 22 1 7 8 0.364
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 4 0 2 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · SUNY Oswego
+239.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6755
Defenseman overall
#1026
Defenseman born in 1990
#1392
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eitan Geralnik
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Waldhauser
New England College · 2022-23
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2002-03
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.