← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Waldhauser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-16 Country: Austria
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Cornwall Colts CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0723 0.0715 0.2579 0.2549
2022-23 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 50 28 21 49 0.980 0.1282 0.1220 0.3326 0.3164
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast 16 5 6 11 0.688
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast 25 5 6 11 0.440
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 25 15 26 41 1.640

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22796
Forward overall
#1249
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2014-15
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.