IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lindsey Gullett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Winkler Flyers MJHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0702 0.2102 0.2298
2005-06 — MJHL 42 10 11 21 0.500 0.0963 0.1003 0.3153 0.3285
2006-07 Neepawa Titans MJHL 60 10 19 29 0.483 0.0930 0.0925 0.3048 0.3033
2007-08 — MJHL 58 24 31 55 0.948 0.1825 0.1718 0.5980 0.5628
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 28 2 8 10 0.357
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 18 3 8 11 0.611
2009-10 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 23 6 7 13 0.565
2008-09 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 24 5 3 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2008-09 · Castleton
+178.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29987
Forward overall
#962
Forward born in 1987
#438
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Schrotenboer
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.