IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Schrotenboer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 56 9 18 27 0.482 0.1771 0.1773 0.5089 0.5096
2011-12 — NAHL 56 26 29 55 0.982 0.3608 0.3435 1.0366 0.9869
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 22 10 5 15 0.682
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 27 6 9 15 0.556
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 28 8 8 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2012-13 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+141.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14988
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 1991
#704
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.