IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trever Hertz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 8 1 2 3 0.375 0.1445 0.1580 0.5457 0.5966
2007-08 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 31 25 56 0.933 0.3596 0.3738 1.3582 1.4117
2008-09 — BCHL 64 36 36 72 1.125 0.4335 0.4324 1.6372 1.6330
2009-10 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 35 38 73 1.217 0.4688 0.4420 1.7707 1.6694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 8 17 25 0.926
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC JR 25 13 13 26 1.040
2011-12 Utica D3 UCHC SO 26 12 18 30 1.154
2010-11 Utica D3 UCHC FR 26 11 10 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2010-11 · Utica
+115.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8419
Forward overall
#315
Forward born in 1989
#168
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Olson
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Leone
Utica · 2007-08
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Fredericks
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.