IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trever Hertz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 8 1 2 3 0.375 0.1459 0.1595 0.5469 0.5979
2007-08 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 31 25 56 0.933 0.3632 0.3775 1.3610 1.4146
2008-09 — BCHL 64 36 36 72 1.125 0.4378 0.4367 1.6406 1.6364
2009-10 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 60 35 38 73 1.217 0.4735 0.4464 1.7743 1.6728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 8 17 25 0.926
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC JR 25 13 13 26 1.040
2011-12 Utica D3 — SO 26 12 18 30 1.154
2010-11 Utica D3 — FR 26 11 10 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2010-11 · Utica
+113.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4183
Forward overall
#166
Forward born in 1989
#173
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Leone
Utica · 2007-08
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Fredericks
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.