IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Fredericks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0799 0.0801 0.1531 0.1534
2015-16 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 53 51 38 89 1.679 0.2831 0.2662 0.6977 0.6560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 29 6 16 22 0.759
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 16 8 8 16 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+509.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11746
Forward overall
#416
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zeke Costello
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Scorpio
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarryd Ten Vaanholt
Elmira · 2011-12
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.