← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Fredericks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0620 0.0621 0.1527 0.1530
2015-16 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 53 51 38 89 1.679 0.2860 0.2689 0.7116 0.6690
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 29 6 16 22 0.759
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 16 8 8 16 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+527.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9240
Forward overall
#406
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.