← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Fredericks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0615 0.0616 0.1527 0.1530
2015-16 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 53 51 38 89 1.679 0.2804 0.2636 0.6991 0.6573
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 6 8 14 0.500
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 29 6 16 22 0.759
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 16 8 8 16 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+539.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9297
Forward overall
#401
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.