IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarryd Ten Vaanholt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1336 0.4851 0.5047
2010-11 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 58 22 28 50 0.862 0.3322 0.3301 1.2546 1.2465
2011-12 — BCHL 61 31 36 67 1.098 0.4232 0.3972 1.5985 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 24 9 8 17 0.708
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 12 23 35 1.296
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 26 12 17 29 1.115
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 20 5 7 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2012-13 · Elmira
+89.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10721
Forward overall
#422
Forward born in 1991
#315
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Somers
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.