← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Somers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 4 4 8 0.200 0.0490 0.0533 0.1377 0.1498
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 25 31 56 1.037 0.2542 0.2542 0.7140 0.7140
2020-21 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 27 65 92 1.704 0.4176 0.3935 1.1730 1.1054
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 15 23 38 1.357
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 29 14 23 37 1.276
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 32 13 25 38 1.188
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 31 7 20 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2022-23 · Adrian
+295.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12480
Forward overall
#578
Forward born in 2001
#295
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2024-25
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.