← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Somers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 4 4 8 0.200 0.0559 0.0608 0.1380 0.1502
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 25 31 56 1.037 0.2897 0.2897 0.7156 0.7156
2020-21 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 27 65 92 1.704 0.4760 0.4486 1.1757 1.1080
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 15 23 38 1.357
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 29 14 23 37 1.276
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 32 13 25 38 1.188
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 31 7 20 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2022-23 · Adrian
+246.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9062
Forward overall
#266
Forward born in 2001
#344
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.