← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Dill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Elite 40 19 26 45 1.125 0.1038 0.1150 0.2576 0.2853
2018-19 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 42 24 50 74 1.762 0.1626 0.1727 0.4035 0.4285
2019-20 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 18 22 40 0.909 0.1189 0.1189 0.3085 0.3085
2020-21 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 28 16 24 40 1.429 0.1869 0.1869 0.4849 0.4849
2021-22 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 14 7 14 21 1.500 0.1962 0.1882 0.5091 0.4882
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 11 13 24 0.923
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE JR 23 6 16 22 0.957
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SO 28 12 18 30 1.071
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE FR 29 15 14 29 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2022-23 · Curry
+541.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7533
Forward overall
#317
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.